[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120616133221.GA31570@somewhere>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:32:25 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
ksummit-2012-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND or not ATTEND] That's the
question!
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:29:06AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:50:05 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > A good start would be if you could convert your kernel statistics into
> > accounting the consolidation effects of contributions instead of
> > fostering the idiocy that corporates have started to measure themself
> > and the performance of their employees (I'm not kidding, it's the sad
> > reality) with line and commit count statistics.
>
> I would dearly love to come up with a way to measure "real work" in
> some fashion; I've just not, yet, figured out how to do that. I do
> fear that the simple numbers we're able to generate end up creating the
> wrong kinds of incentives.
>
> Any thoughts on how to measure "consolidation effects"? I toss out
> numbers on code removal sometimes, but that turns out to not be a whole
> lot more useful than anything else on its own.
I fear there is no reliable automated way to measure that :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists