linux-kernel - Re: SNB PCI root information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQU-Ev1goCqA9LfBJL6T4WTkazJMExPTtz71H44aZrSVnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:36:06 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lenb@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SNB PCI root information

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> I have one local internal similar patch for SNB iio for crossing check
>> if BIOS set correctly.
>> but I don't think i will try to get blessing from intel to publish it.
>
> Why do you need Intels blessing to post a useful patch?
>
> Is that patch based on public available documentation and/or your own
> findings?
>
> If yes, then hell we don't care whether Intel likes it or not.
>
> If not, then the question arises what Intel has to hide in that area.

it is with Intel NDA EDS or BIOS writing guide.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/