linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: cpu: use printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1339880865.23975.2.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:07:45 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	dave@....org
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: cpu: use printk_once

On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 21:45 +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Use printk_once() instead of extra variables.

This is _very_ slightly larger.
The only thing I'd change is to use true instead of 1;
Well, I might use pr_info too...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
[]
> @@ -457,7 +457,6 @@ void __cpuinit detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
>  	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>  	int index_msb, core_bits;
> -	static bool printed;
>  
>  	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HT))
>  		return;
> @@ -493,12 +492,11 @@ void __cpuinit detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  				       ((1 << core_bits) - 1);
>  
>  out:
> -	if (!printed && (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings) > 1) {
> -		printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
> -		       c->phys_proc_id);
> -		printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
> -		       c->cpu_core_id);
> -		printed = 1;
> +	if ((c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings) > 1) {
> +		printk_once(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
> +			    c->phys_proc_id);
> +		printk_once(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
> +			    c->cpu_core_id);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> index 4397e98..2f01ae0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ void __cpuinit detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, sub_index;
>  	unsigned int ht_mask_width, core_plus_mask_width;
>  	unsigned int core_select_mask, core_level_siblings;
> -	static bool printed;
>  
>  	if (c->cpuid_level < 0xb)
>  		return;
> @@ -86,14 +85,9 @@ void __cpuinit detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  
>  	c->x86_max_cores = (core_level_siblings / smp_num_siblings);
>  
> -	if (!printed) {
> -		printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
> -		       c->phys_proc_id);
> -		if (c->x86_max_cores > 1)
> -			printk(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
> -			       c->cpu_core_id);
> -		printed = 1;
> -	}
> +	printk_once(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
> +	if (c->x86_max_cores > 1)
> +		printk_once(KERN_INFO  "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
>  	return;
>  #endif
>  }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/