[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339839177.39525.YahooMailNeo@web111722.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@...oo.com>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: about interlagos
Thanks
// Naderan *Mahmood;
----- Original Message -----
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
To: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@...oo.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: about interlagos
Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> As you can see, although interlagos is the newest one which has higher cpu
> clock rate and higher cache size, the bogomips of interlagos is the lowest!
> I read that bogomips is not a true measurement,
Indeed it is not.
> but it senses as a speed meter.
It measures the speed of one particular delay loop. Because such a busy
loop is pretty much the silliest thing you could do to a CPU, it does
not make sense to use it to measure overall CPU speed, or to compare
different microarchitectures.
> Any idea?
If you want to know how fast your code will execute, you have to measure
that code. If you are too lazy to do this, search for a benchmark that
represents that code well; for general-purpose code, the gcc part of the
SPEC CPU benchmark probably comes closest.
Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists