lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:00:18 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Fred Isaman <iisaman@...app.com>
Subject: [ 37/69] NFSv4: Fix unnecessary delegation returns in nfs4_do_open

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>

commit 2d0dbc6ae8a5194aaecb9cfffb9053f38fce8b86 upstream.

While nfs4_do_open() expects the fmode argument to be restricted to
combinations of FMODE_READ and FMODE_WRITE, both nfs4_atomic_open()
and nfs4_proc_create will pass the nfs_open_context->mode,
which contains the full fmode_t.

This patch ensures that nfs4_do_open strips the other fmode_t bits,
fixing a problem in which the nfs4_do_open call would result in an
unnecessary delegation return.

Reported-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1825,6 +1825,7 @@
 	struct nfs4_state *res;
 	int status;
 
+	fmode &= FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
 	do {
 		status = _nfs4_do_open(dir, dentry, fmode, flags, sattr, cred, &res);
 		if (status == 0)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ