[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206161811020.797@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: David Mackey <tdmackey@...tter.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, penberg@...nel.org
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, cl@...ux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] slab/mempolicy: always use local policy from interrupt
context
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, David Mackey wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index f15c1b2..cb0b230 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -1602,8 +1602,14 @@ static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
> > * task can change it's policy. The system default policy requires no
> > * such protection.
> > */
> > -unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy)
> > +unsigned slab_node(void)
> > {
> > + struct mempolicy *policy;
> > +
> > + if (in_interrupt())
> > + return numa_node_id();
> > +
> > + policy = current->mempolicy;
> > if (!policy || policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
> > return numa_node_id();
> >
>
> Should probably be numa_mem_id() in both these cases for
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES, but it won't cause a problem in this form
> either.
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>
Still missing from linux-next, who's going to pick this up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists