[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FDE8D27.6030508@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:06:31 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
CC: cjb@...top.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER
if GPIO not yet available
On 06/17/2012 04:11 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> of_get_named_gpio_flags() and of_get_named_gpio() return -EPROBE_DEFER if the
> respective GPIO is not (yet) available. This is useful if driver's probe()
> functions try to get a GPIO whose controller isn't probed yet. Thus, the driver
> can be probed again later on.
>
> The function still returns -EINVAL on other errors (parse error or node doesn't
> exist). This way, the case of an optional/intentionally missing GPIO is handled
> appropriately.
While I agree this is a correct change, it is going to break some
existing code - at least sound/soc/tegra/tegra_{wm8903.c,alc5632.c}. I'm
happy to send patches for those files though (is this going into 3.5 or
3.6?). However, have you audited all existing callers (including
indirect, e.g. through plain of_get_named_gpio()) for issues this will
cause?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists