[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120618085822.GA8304@moon>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:58:22 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.5] c/r: prctl: less paranoid prctl_set_mm_exe_file()
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:44:24PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:38:29PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > >Yeah, you've changed !path_equal to path_equal. And yes, getting rid of
> > >num_exe_file_vmas is good idea. Btw, Konstantin, why do we need to
> > >call for path_equal? Maybe we can simply test for mm->exe_file == NULL,
> > >and refuse to change anything if it's not nil value? This will simplify
> > >the code.
> >
> > After removing VM_EXECUTABLE and mm->num_exe_file_vmas mm->exe_file
> > will never becomes NULL automatically. Patch for this not commited yet,
> > but I hope it will be in 3.6.
>
> OK, lets stick with current patch then.
To clarify
Tested-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Andrew, could you please pick up this bugfix. It's critical for us.
P.S. Together with patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/15/220 it'll be
last changes to prctl in a sake of c/r I think. Would be cool to have
both bugfixes in 3.5.
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists