[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1340011219-31657-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:20:19 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To: cjb@...top.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-pl022: Adjust probe() to of_get_named_gpio() returning -EPROBE_DEFER
The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer
of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c.
This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to defer.
Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
---
Applies to 3.5-rc3
Should this patch be joined with gpiolib-of's patch to of_get_named_gpio()? Or
should they just be issued as a series?
drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
@@ -2075,7 +2075,7 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, co
for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++) {
int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
- if (cs_gpio == -ENODEV) {
+ if (cs_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
status = -EPROBE_DEFER;
goto err_no_gpio;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists