linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/mm: remove arch-specific PTE/PMD get-and-clear functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:43:28 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	"xen-devel\@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/mm: remove arch-specific PTE/PMD get-and-clear functions

On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:41:16 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 11:29 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > 
> > Lets rope Rusty in this since he is the maintainer of lguest.
> >
> 
> Also, let's have realistic expectations for lguest.
> 
> I don't want to break lguest just for sh*ts and giggles, but if lguest
> is in the way of making forward progress for other things, it would have
> to have a very strong case to not be sacrificed.

Exactly!  Please cc' me if you need me to unbreak lguest, but for
performance?  Not really...

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/