linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: introduce readonly memslot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:11:04 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: introduce readonly memslot

On 06/12/2012 05:49 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> In current code, if we map a readonly memory space from host to guest
> and the page is not currently mapped in the host, we will get a fault-pfn
> and async is not allowed, then the vm will crash
> 
> Address Avi's idea, we introduce readonly memory region to map ROM/ROMD
> to the guest
> 
> index 4b96bc2..b551db1 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ void update_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, struct kvm_memory_slot *new)
> 
>  static int check_memory_region_flags(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
>  {
> -	if (mem->flags & ~KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES)
> +	if (mem->flags & ~(KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES | KVM_MEM_READONLY))
>  		return -EINVAL;

Only x86 supports readonly so far.

> 
> -static unsigned long gfn_to_hva_many(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> -				     gfn_t *nr_pages)
> +static unsigned long __gfn_to_hva_many(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> +				     gfn_t *nr_pages, bool write)
>  {
> -	if (!slot || slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID)
> +	if (!slot || slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID ||
> +	      ((slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY) && write))
>  		return bad_hva();
> 
>  	if (nr_pages)
> @@ -1045,6 +1046,12 @@ static unsigned long gfn_to_hva_many(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
>  	return gfn_to_hva_memslot(slot, gfn);
>  }
> 
> +static unsigned long gfn_to_hva_many(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> +				     gfn_t *nr_pages)
> +{
> +	return __gfn_to_hva_many(slot, gfn, nr_pages, true);
> +}

We have dozens of translation functions: read/write guest virtual, guest
physical (nested and non nested), host virtual, host physical,
atomic/nonatomic, sync/async, with/without slot lookup, and probably a
few more I forgot.

I think we should refactor this into a series of on-step translations:

   /*
    * Translate gva/len write access to a number of tlb entries
    * (due to cross-page splits) or a fault
    */
   gva_to_tlb(gva, len, ACCESS_WRITE, &translation);
   /*
    * Translate tlb entries to callbacks that do I/O (either directly
    * or through KVM_EXIT_MMIO, provided there is no exception pending
    */
   tlb_to_io(&translation, &iolist, IO_ATOMIC);
   /*
    * Initiate I/O (if no exception)
    */
   run_iolist(&iolist, data);

   struct gpa_scatterlist {
       unsigned nr_entries;
       struct {
           gpa_t gpa;
           unsigned len;
       } entry[2];
       struct x86_exception exception;
   };

   struct kvm_iolist {
       unsigned nr_entries;
       struct kvm_ioentry {
           struct kvm_memslot *slot;  /* NULL for mmio */
           struct something *kernel_iodevice;
           gfn_t page_in_slot;
           unsigned offset_in_page;
           unsigned len;
           void (*iofunc)(struct kvm_ioentry *entry, void *data);
       } entry[2];
       struct x86_exception execption;
   };

This is of course outside the scope of this patchset, just something to
think about (and write opinions on).



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/