lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda5nYmAT3-fkxdYQEGpi6U=L-kphQEu3naoxPzO9a-7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:52:06 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	"devendra.aaru" <devendra.aaru@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: return of pinctrl_register and handing at drivers that use
 this function

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM, devendra.aaru <devendra.aaru@...il.com> wrote:

> since the pinctrl_register returns a pointer of structure type "struct
> pinctrl_dev" or NULL if it was failed to register the pinctrl driver,
> so IS_ERR checking is not required?

Yes. (Unless I did something wrong.)

> My understanding about IS_ERR is that its used when the pointer
> addresses are kind of error codes rather actual addresses,
> but are a kind of return codes of functions returning integer types.

You are absolutely right.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ