[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340021117.22848.3.camel@lappy>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:05:17 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
avi@...hat.com, penberg@...helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-spec: flexible configuration layout
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 14:54 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:36:43PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >They don't exist in kernel code either, for same reason as above.
> > >
> > >Nothing will break if we remove it since no one really used it, we were
> > >probably the first and only implementation of the spec which considered
> > >them :)
> >
> > As long as we are able to run older versions of the KVM tool with
> > newer kernels and vice versa, I see no reason why we can't drop
> > 64-bit features from the KVM tool.
> >
> > Pekka
>
> So what happened? Did you guys do this? Need to know what to do to make
> progress. IIUC Rusty removed the new fields in 0.9.3.
> Does your tool still use them? Did any version of the tool released by
> distros do so?
Yup, they were removed quite a while ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists