[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:23:04 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: cjb@...top.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER
if GPIO not yet available
On 06/18/2012 05:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Thanks for the hint! I previously also suspected sth. like this but
>> didn't find it in v3.5-rc3. In broonie's sound.git for-next, I now
>> finally found it.
>>
>> Should be easy to fix (replacing the if (... == -ENODEV) to -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>
>> Will you provide patches as signalled, of should I? Which branch would
>> be the correct one to build on top?
>
> I'm happy either way. It'd probably be best to roll the change into your
> patch/series so you can manage all the dependencies in one series, but
> if you can't for some reason, I'm happy to provide a patch for this.
I should be able ;-) - is broonie's sound.git, branch for-next the
correct one to patch against? Or sth. better suited?
Thanks in advance,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists