[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340035630.2182.19.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:07:10 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] usb: Convert dbg to pr_eliminated and pr_debug
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 08:23 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:25:10PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Change the dbg macro to use pr_eliminated when not
> > DEBUG and pr_debug with DEBUG so dynamic_debug can
> > be used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/usb.h | 12 +++++-------
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/usb.h b/include/linux/usb.h
> > index f717fbd..56b88b8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/usb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/usb.h
> > @@ -1714,14 +1714,12 @@ extern void usb_register_notify(struct notifier_block *nb);
> > extern void usb_unregister_notify(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >
> > #ifdef DEBUG
> > -#define dbg(format, arg...) \
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: " format "\n", __FILE__, ##arg)
> > +#define dbg(format, ...) \
> > + pr_debug("%s: " format "\n", __FILE__, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> No, I really want to delete this macro entirely, and am slowly working
> toward that, moving drivers to use the correct dev_dbg() macro instead.
It'd be hard to replace it with only dev_dbg
as no struct device is always available.
And anyway, why go slowly? Why not just do it?
There's 41 files / 1442 instances
$ git grep --name-only -E "^\s*#\s*include\s*[\<\"]linux/usb\.h[\>\"]" | \
xargs grep -El "\bdbg\s*\("|wc -l
41
$ git grep --name-only -E "^\s*#\s*include\s*[\<\"]linux/usb\.h[\>\"]" | \
xargs grep -E "\bdbg\s*\(" | wc -l
1442
There are also 5 redefinitions of dbg in there.
> > -#define dbg(format, arg...) \
> > -do { \
> > - if (0) \
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: " format "\n", __FILE__, ##arg); \
> > -} while (0)
> > +#define dbg(format, ...) \
> > + printk_eliminated(KERN_DEBUG "%s: " format "\n", \
> > + __FILE__, ##__VA_ARGS)
>
> As Paul pointed out, this breaks the build,
Yeah, Typos happen.
Paul's imagery was certainly colorful though a bit
umm, dispassionate. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists