[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201206182229.32055.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:29:31 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: In kernel hibernation, suspend to both
On Monday, June 18, 2012, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:33:06AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 22:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Yeah, that will do.
> >
> > Something like this maybe. I didn't really test this, so Borislav,
> > please let me know whether this is something that may works for you.
>
> Yeah, this could probably work but it changes the progress indicator
> unconditionally.
>
> I don't know what the general consensus is about the progress indicator
> but if you want to keep the old behavior too, you probably need to carve
> out the printk functionality from save_image() and pass flags to the new
> function which printks different output depending on how it is.
>
> If we don't want the current output with how many pages it needs to use
> on swap, then we can do the dots.
>
> Frankly, I don't have a preference.
I'm not sure if the current behavior is worth preserving. It's a bit hackish
and doesn't work with dmesg buffer, as you have noticed.
So, I think printing a status line every 10% would be fine.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists