[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYmTRRRf_gMg4R57r7yxgdyFU+LBfWhqqiZ1zFsar3kNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:15:42 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/2] regulator: ab8500: Use regulator_list_voltage_linear
for ab8500_regulator_fixed_ops
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 04:24:52PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> > Also removes set_voltage_time_sel callback from ab8500_regulator_fixed_ops
>> > because the voltage won't change. ( And ab8500_regulator_fixed_ops does not
>> > implement get_voltage_sel so set_voltage_time_sel won't be called )
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
>
>> I cannot test this either, it does not apply cleanly on v3.5-rc3.
>
>> Care to respin?
>
> This is a random development patch which means it'll get applied against
> the regulator tree as it stands so that's what the patch should be
> submitted against - if you're going to test then grabbing my for-next
> branch is the way forward.
I was mostly reacting to the "RFT" keyword in the subject, so I tried to
test rather than just ACK it, but it's applied now anyway so whatever.
Acked-by.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists