lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120619061606.GA32193@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:16:06 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>, riku.voipio@....fi,
	bryan.wu@...onical.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: Add DT support for leds-pca9532

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:02:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/17/2012 05:51 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 16/06/12 17:06, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>> +- nxp,typecodes: groups of 2 bits for each of the 16 pins:
> >>> +  0: None
> >>> +  1: LED
> >>> +  2: Beep
> >>> +  3: GPIO
> >>> +- nxp,statecodes: groups of 2 bits for each of the 16 pins:
> >>> +  0: off
> >>> +  1: on
> >>> +  2: pwm0
> >>> +  3: pwm1
> >>> +
> >>> +Optional properties:
> >>> +- nxp,psc: array of 2 numbers: PSC values for the two PWM channels (see datasheet)
> >>> +- nxp,pwm: array of 2 numbers: PWM values for the two PWM channels (see datasheet)
> >>
> >> Shouldn't that all be exposed using a combination of the pinctrl
> >> bindings that are in 3.5, and the PWM bindings that should be coming in 3.6?
> > 
> > Thanks for the note! I found a pwm tree that should have this at
> > 
> > http://gitorious.org/linux-pwm/linux-pwm
> > 
> > but it gives me server errors. Is there a place where I can have a look?
> 
> That URL (with http:// replace with git://) did work for me. It seemed a
> little slow at first, but did work without issue. I Cc'd Thierry in case
> there's any other location available.

There isn't. IIRC, back when I finalized the PWM subsystem during the last
cycle, Arnd Bergmann suggested that I request an account and repository on
kernel.org back when the subsystem was ready. At the time I didn't think
it necessary, but reading this, perhaps it wouldn't be such a bad idea.
kernel.org should have better availability than gitorious.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ