[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120619101928.GD13108@x2.net.home>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:19:28 +0200
From: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
util-linux@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Bernhard Voelker <mail@...nhard-voelker.de>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: block: update ioprio.txt
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:51:37PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
>
> The ionice.c in ioprio.txt document needed updating for the latest util-linux
> version.
>
> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> CC: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
> CC: Bernhard Voelker <mail@...nhard-voelker.de>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
> ---
> Documentation/block/ioprio.txt | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
BTW, does it make sense to maintain duplicate, untested and unused
code in kernel docs if we already have regular ionice(1) implementation
in util-linux?
Would be better to add URL to *maintained* code?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-linux/util-linux.git;a=blob_plain;f=schedutils/ionice.c;hb=HEAD
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists