[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120619102250.GA787@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:22:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:17:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 07:11 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > $ rmmod microcode; modprobe microcode
> >
> > but then the same guys come :-) and say they don't want to reload
> > modules for security reasons.
>
> Nah, they built their kernel without modules, much more secure!
Not secure enough - they don't get microcode then (ucode loader uses
request_firmware()) and has to be module for the initial load, at least.
But I haven't tested what happens when it is built in and I use the
reload interface, hehe something to play with today.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists