lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:36:09 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: support for regulator match by regulator-compatible

On Tuesday 19 June 2012 04:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:04:00PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> Agree. Currently following regulators are using this (based on grep)
>> mfd/tps6586x.c
>> regulator/ab8500.c
>> regulator/db8500-prcmu.c
>> and regulator/tps65910.
>
> I've no concerns with the interface or the code itself other than the
> usability issue with partial deployment so if you could do the updates
> for the other drivers that'd be great.  I'll hold off on applying this
> until we've got everything else updated.

Mark,
Just thinking on optimizing the changes require, we can do it in 3 
patches only:
- In place of adding new api of_regulator_match_by_compatible(), we can 
modify the existing of_regulator_match() itself  to look for 
regulator-compatible for matching. This can be done in first patch.
- Need not to change the .c files, here just change the documentation of 
these regulator dt binding. All can be done in second patch.
- Change the dts file to have this policy and seeing only on 
arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi for ab8500 and db8500-prcmu. So it will be 
third patch .

We will not need any change on above c files as the api is not going to 
change.

Require your opinion.






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ