[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120619000150.GA4208@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:01:50 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Devendra Naga <devendra.aaru@...il.com>
Cc: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging/rtl8192u: cleanup coding style problems
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:17:40PM +0530, Devendra Naga wrote:
> The following warnings / errors were cleaned
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:25: ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:28: ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:30: WARNING: line over 80 characters
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:31: ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:41: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:45: ERROR: need consistent spacing a round '&' (ctx:WxO)
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:45: ERROR: space prohibited after that '~' (ctx:OxW)
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:51: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:53: ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:55: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:57: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:69: ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxV)
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:69: ERROR: space prohibited before that close parenthesis ')'
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:72: ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c:72: ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
>
> Signed-off-by: Devendra Naga <devendra.aaru@...il.com>
It's good you broke this down as to what you were fixing, but I don't
like this change:
> - if(bit) return 1;
> - return 0;
> + return bit ? 1: 0;
Please don't use ? : if you can help it, it is just hard to read.
Care to redo this one and resend both patches?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists