[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874nq8hyfa.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:40:09 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, acme@...stprotocols.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, weisbec@...il.com,
namhyung.kim@....com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] libtraceevent/perf: Add support for trace-cmd plugins
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:26:02 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:11 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> > trace-cmd report -N
>> > [...]
>> > kvm-6172 [000] 14669573.114126: kvm_entry: vcpu 0
>> > kvm-6172 [000] 14669573.114127: kvm_exit: [FAILED TO PARSE] exit_reason=30 guest_rip=0xffff357a isa=1 info1=217841672 info2=0
>> > kvm-6172 [000] 14669573.114130: kvm_emulate_insn: [FAILED TO PARSE] rip=4294915450 csbase=0 len=1 insn=ì[ÃWVS<89>Ã<89>Öš^Gu^Q^O^E flags=5 failed=0
>> > kvm-6172 [000] 14669573.114130: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0xcfc size 1 count 1
>> > kvm-6172 [000] 14669573.114131: kvm_userspace_exit: reason KVM_EXIT_IO (2)
>> > kvm-6172 [000] 14669573.114134: kvm_entry: vcpu 0
>> >
>>
>> What I want to do is make it not to fail with default print_fmt (ie. w/o
>> plugin support). IOW using a plugin to improve things like above is
>> good, but not using it shouldn't break/fail anything. So I think fixing
>> the TP_printk is needed.
>
> I'm not sure its broken anymore per-say. As I just ran this without
> plugins (with the -N switch) and it doesn't break. It sends out some
> nasty warnings, but continues on its happy way with a warning that it
> '[FAILED TO PARSE]'. And some warnings in the beginning.
>
> But it doesn't totally fail. We could probably clean it up a bit too.
> What it does above is simply print out the raw data and lists the
> fields.
>
> The problem with modifying the TP_printk() is that this is also used by
> raw tracing (the /debug/tracing/trace file). Without using tools. The
> TP_printk() is really for that. The plugins is the way for tools to
> handle it.
>
Ok. Then how about using __print_hex() for __print_insn? AFAICS
ftrace_print_hex_seq() looks almost same as __print_insn() and as it's a
generic function we can add its handler in libtraceevnt.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists