[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120619110728.14504b91ec1c2ee9cd81b413@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:07:28 +0900
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:21:20 -0300
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> wrote:
> > [not about this patch]
> >
> > EPT accessed/dirty bits will be used for more things in the future.
> > Are there any rules for using these bits?
> >
> > Same as other bits?
>
> Do you mean hardware rules or KVM rules?
KVM rules.
Your concern was about "lock-less" v. "current EPT-A/D code".
My question was what we should care not to break the former
in the future.
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists