[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE00DBF.7080405@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:57:27 +0530
From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Justin Lecher <jlec@...too.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] fs: cachefiles: Add support for large files
in filesystem caching
On 06/19/2012 04:34 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> From: Justin Lecher <jlec@...too.org>
>>
>> Support the caching of large files.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31182
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@...too.org>
>> Tested-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.com>
>> ---
>> fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
>> index 0e3c092..d136686 100644
>> --- a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
>> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
>> @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ int cachefiles_write_page(struct fscache_storage *op, struct page *page)
>> dget(object->backer);
>> mntget(cache->mnt);
>> file = dentry_open(object->backer, cache->mnt, O_RDWR,
>> - cache->cache_cred);
>> + (O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE), cache->cache_cred);
>
> Doesn't compile.
Oops, my bad. While refreshing the original patch against the latest
kernel, I seemed to have introduced an extra argument while attempting
to limit the characters to 80. Extremely sorry about that.
> How extensively was this change tested? Please describe the testing
> which was performed?
>
The original patch was tested by mounting a NFS share with fscache
option enabled, do a md5sum on a nfs file larger than 2GB and ensure
that the file is getting cached by fscache (watch cache size growing)
on x86_64.
Please find below the fixed one.
From: Justin Lecher <jlec@...too.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: cachefiles: Add support for large files in filesystem caching
Support the caching of large files.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31182
Tested by mounting a NFS share with fscache option enabled, do a
md5sum on a nfs file larger than 2GB and ensure that the file is getting
cached by fscache (watch cache size growing) on x86_64.
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@...too.org>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.com>
Tested-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
index 0e3c092..cc7ef95 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
@@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ int cachefiles_write_page(struct fscache_storage *op, struct page *page)
* own time */
dget(object->backer);
mntget(cache->mnt);
- file = dentry_open(object->backer, cache->mnt, O_RDWR,
+ file = dentry_open(object->backer, cache->mnt, (O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE),
cache->cache_cred);
if (IS_ERR(file)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(file);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists