[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE182A9.5080101@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:58:33 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v7 05/10] KVM: MMU: fold tlb flush judgement into mmu_spte_update
mmu_spte_update() is the common function, we can easily audit the path
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index a0ea746..6ebbb7a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -478,15 +478,24 @@ static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
/* Rules for using mmu_spte_update:
* Update the state bits, it means the mapped pfn is not changged.
+ *
+ * Whenever we overwrite a writable spte with a read-only one we
+ * should flush remote TLBs. Otherwise rmap_write_protect
+ * will find a read-only spte, even though the writable spte
+ * might be cached on a CPU's TLB, the return value indicates this
+ * case.
*/
-static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+static bool mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
u64 mask, old_spte = *sptep;
+ bool ret = false;
WARN_ON(!is_rmap_spte(new_spte));
- if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
- return mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)) {
+ mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
+ return ret;
+ }
new_spte |= old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask;
@@ -499,13 +508,18 @@ static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
else
old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, new_spte);
+ if (is_writable_pte(old_spte) && !is_writable_pte(new_spte))
+ ret = true;
+
if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
- return;
+ return ret;
if (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, new_spte, shadow_accessed_mask))
kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
if (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, new_spte, shadow_dirty_mask))
kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
+
+ return ret;
}
/*
@@ -2271,7 +2285,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
gfn_t gfn, pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
bool can_unsync, bool host_writable)
{
- u64 spte, entry = *sptep;
+ u64 spte;
int ret = 0;
if (set_mmio_spte(sptep, gfn, pfn, pte_access))
@@ -2349,14 +2363,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
set_pte:
- mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
- /*
- * If we overwrite a writable spte with a read-only one we
- * should flush remote TLBs. Otherwise rmap_write_protect
- * will find a read-only spte, even though the writable spte
- * might be cached on a CPU's TLB.
- */
- if (is_writable_pte(entry) && !is_writable_pte(*sptep))
+ if (mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte))
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
done:
return ret;
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists