[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1BA5D2DFD2730747A2B3725B59933B93C18C29D8B4@HKMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:04:26 +0800
From: Danny Huang <dahuang@...dia.com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: RE: regulator: tps6586x: What is the meaning of
TPS6586X_SLEW_RATE_SET setting?
Hi Axel,
The TPS6586X_SLEW_RATE_SET is not related with hardware register.
It was used to make sure that the slew rate won't be changed by accident.
Thanks,
Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: Axel Lin [mailto:axel.lin@...il.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 19:15
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mike Rapoport; Danny Huang; Liam Girdwood; Mark Brown
Subject: regulator: tps6586x: What is the meaning of TPS6586X_SLEW_RATE_SET setting?
Hi Mike,
While looking at the datasheet (tps65860 and tps65862),
I don't understand why we have TPS6586X_SLEW_RATE_SET (0x08) in the code.
According to the datasheet, BIT3 of SM1SL/SM0SL is not used:
SM1SL [Addr 0x25]
SM0SL [Addr 0x28]
BIT[2:0] SM0/SM1 SUPPLY RAMP RATE
BIT[7:3] NOT USED
So why we need to check the "unused bit" in tps6586x_regulator_set_slew_rate()?
if (!(setting->slew_rate & TPS6586X_SLEW_RATE_SET))
return 0;
Regards,
Axel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists