[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340183979.21745.78.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:19:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
rob.herring@...xeda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] sched: cpu_power: enable ARCH_POWER
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:11 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 11:01, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:28:56AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> Heteregeneous ARM platform uses arch_scale_freq_power function
> >> to reflect the relative capacity of each core
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> >> ---
> >> kernel/sched/features.h | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
> >> index de00a48..d98ae90 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/sched/features.h
> >> +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
> >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY, true)
> >> /*
> >> * Use arch dependent cpu power functions
> >> */
> >> -SCHED_FEAT(ARCH_POWER, false)
> >> +SCHED_FEAT(ARCH_POWER, true)
> >
> > Hmmm...seems we can remove this knob completely.
> >
>
> Peter,
>
> Do you prefer to keep it or remove it completely ?
I prefer to keep it, the 'we can remove it' is true for all feature
bits, they should never be twiddled in normal circumstances, its a debug
feature. As such it makes sense to allow disabling the arch cpu-power
fiddling.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists