lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120620102718.GJ4629@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:57:18 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: move function declarations out of arch

> 
> -extern int  arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr);
> -extern int  arch_uprobe_pre_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
> -extern int  arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
> -extern bool arch_uprobe_xol_was_trapped(struct task_struct *tsk);
> -extern int  arch_uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data);
> -extern void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  #endif	/* _ASM_UPROBES_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> index efe4b33..e2d2948 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
>  struct vm_area_struct;
>  struct mm_struct;
>  struct inode;
> +struct notifier_block;
> +struct arch_uprobe;
> 

One nit:
Do we need this forward declaration. It should anyway be defined in the
asm/uprobes.h?

>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES
>  # include <asm/uprobes.h>
> @@ -118,6 +120,13 @@ extern bool uprobe_deny_signal(void);
>  extern bool __weak arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern void uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
>  extern void uprobe_reset_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
> +
> +extern int  arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr);
> +extern int  arch_uprobe_pre_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern int  arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern bool arch_uprobe_xol_was_trapped(struct task_struct *tsk);
> +extern int  arch_uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data);
> +extern void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  #else /* !CONFIG_UPROBES */
>  struct uprobes_state {
>  };

I am okay with moving the declarations to include/linux/uprobes.h

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ