[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVECyRBie-kgBETmqxPaMx24kUt1W07qAqoGD4vNus5xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:57:45 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:20:59PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Something like the following should fix it.
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>> index 32a0a5e..2770970 100644
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
>> @@ -148,11 +148,15 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start,
>> */
>> int __init_memblock memblock_free_reserved_regions(void)
>> {
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>> if (memblock.reserved.regions == memblock_reserved_init_regions)
>> return 0;
>>
>> return memblock_free(__pa(memblock.reserved.regions),
>> sizeof(struct memblock_region) * memblock.reserved.max);
>> +#else
>> + return 0;
>> +#endif
>
> BTW, this is just ugly and I don't think we're saving any noticeable
> amount by doing this "free - give it to page allocator - reserve
> again" dancing. We should just allocate regions aligned to page
> boundaries and free them later when memblock is no longer in use.
if it is that case, that change could fix other problem problem too.
--- during the one free reserved.regions could double the array.
please check attached patch.
Yinghai
Download attachment "fix_free_memblock_reserve_v4.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (7296 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists