[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE1B31C.6030100@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:25:16 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] ARM: dts: db8500: add node property "regulator-compatible"
regulator node
On 20/06/12 11:06, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:56:22AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>>> Are you OK to have the first patch with adding property
>
> ...
>
>> Yes I'm fine with it.
>
> So is that an ack?
Sure why not. Although, Linus Walleij has the final say.
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> It's only the unnecessary reg and *-size properties I'm opposed to.
>
> My understanding is that they're required by DT policies in the same way
> that some of the other verbiage is.
Well I haven't put them in the DB8500 Device Tree if they're not useful
and nothing untoward has occurred.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists