[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE14149.7030807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:19:37 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] zcache: fix refcount leak
On 06/20/2012 10:54 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 04:06 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>
>> On 06/19/2012 02:49 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>>
>>> My preference would be to fix it the opposite way, by
>>> checking and ignoring zcache_host in zcache_put_pool.
>>> The ref-counting is to ensure that a client isn't
>>> accidentally destroyed while in use (for multiple-client
>>> users such as ramster and kvm) and since zcache_host is a static
>>> struct, it should never be deleted so need not be ref-counted.
>>
>>
>> If we do that, we'll need to comment it. If we don't, it won't be
>> obvious why we are refcounting every zcache client except one. It'll
>> look like a bug.
>
>
> Okay, i will fix it like Dan's way and comment it.
Hmm...But i notice that zcache_host is the same as other clients, all
of them are static struct:
| static struct zcache_client zcache_host;
| static struct zcache_client zcache_clients[MAX_CLIENTS];
And all of them are not destroyed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists