[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120620113917.GA1925@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:39:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, pjt@...gle.com,
paul@...lmenage.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl,
nacc@...ibm.com, rientjes@...gle.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, tj@...nel.org,
mschmidt@...hat.com, berrange@...hat.com,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
liuj97@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets, suspend/resume: Fixes,
cleanups and optimizations
* Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 07:46 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>
> > Currently the kernel doesn't handle cpusets properly during
> > suspend/resume. After a resume, all non-root cpusets end up
> > having only 1 cpu (the boot cpu), causing massive
> > performance degradation of workloads. One major user of
> > cpusets is libvirt, which means that after a
> > suspend/hibernation cycle, all VMs suddenly end up running
> > terribly slow!
> >
> > Also, the kernel moves the tasks from one cpuset to another
> > during CPU hotplug in the suspend/resume path, leading to a
> > task-management nightmare after resume.
> >
> > Patch 1 fixes this by keeping cpusets unmodified in the
> > suspend/resume path. But to ensure we don't trip over, it
> > keeps the sched domains updated during every CPU hotplug in
> > the s/r path. This is a long standing issue and we need to
> > fix up stable kernels too.
> >
> > The rest of the patches in the series are mostly
> > cleanups/optimizations.
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Would you be taking these patches through -tip for 3.6?
They are now in tip:sched/core.
Note that I removed the Cc:stable tag - it's not a regression
fix and such it is not eligible for immediate -stable backports.
( Once they are upstream and have been problem-free upstream for
several weeks then *maybe* we could forward the first commit
to -stable, as a super special exception. )
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists