[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE1F9A0.6080200@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:26:08 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
CC: khali@...ux-fr.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de, swarren@...dia.com,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pgaikwad@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: tegra: use clk_disable_unprepare in place of clk_disable
On 06/20/2012 06:56 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Use clk_disable_unprepare() inplace of clk_disable().
> This was missed as part of moving clock enable/disable to
> prepare/unprepare for using the common clock framework.
Wolfram,
Since I've taken the other I2C patch on this topic through the Tegra
tree (in order to satisfy any common clock dependencies there), I
believe I should take this one patch through the Tegra tree too.
I see no reason not to take the second patch in the series through the
I2C tree though.
Do you agree?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists