[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120619.213703.513466167861199217.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhupesh.sharma@...com
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
federico.vaga@...il.com, giancarlo.asnaghi@...com,
wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
From: Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@...com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:27:11 +0800
> clk_get/clk_put* variants are usually used by ARM platforms.
> Protecting their calls under macro 'CONFIG_HAVE_CLK' should solve the problem.
No, we don't pepper foo.c files with crappy ifdefs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists