[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120620173025.834646821@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:31:17 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: [ 57/61] ntp: Correct TAI offset during leap second
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
commit dd48d708ff3e917f6d6b6c2b696c3f18c019feed upstream.
When repeating a UTC time value during a leap second (when the UTC
time should be 23:59:60), the TAI timescale should not stop. The kernel
NTP code increments the TAI offset one second too late. This patch fixes
the issue by incrementing the offset during the leap second itself.
Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/time/ntp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/time/ntp.c
+++ b/kernel/time/ntp.c
@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
if (secs % 86400 == 0) {
leap = -1;
time_state = TIME_OOP;
+ time_tai++;
printk(KERN_NOTICE
"Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC\n");
}
@@ -426,7 +427,6 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
}
break;
case TIME_OOP:
- time_tai++;
time_state = TIME_WAIT;
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists