[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE2585A.3000505@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:10:18 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system
On 06/20/2012 04:08 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 01:28 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> which makes me wonder whether we still need that OLD INTERFACE.
>>> Henrique, any thoughts here?
>>
>> Yes I need it, I've no f'ing clue where to put the ucode image so that
>> the whole firmware mess can find it :-)
>
> iucode_tool -K <name of intel microcode .dat/.bin file(s)> will do it
> for you :p
>
I'm wondering about the new format... it seems to potentially make it
harder to do the proper retaining of compatible CPU microcodes.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists