lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:37:14 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, lrg@...com,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] regulator: dt: regulator match by
 regulator-compatible

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:51:27PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> At least, I don't think it's common to refer to nodes as phandles;
> phandles are usually the values used at "client" sites to refer to
> nodes IIUC.

Right, I always think of the phandle as being the label (which is
present at both ends of the link - the client refers to the handle the
node provdes.  Though now I think about it I suppose it might be
Hungarian with the node having a handle and the client having a
phandle...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists