[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120620233714.GD4037@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:37:14 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, lrg@...com,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] regulator: dt: regulator match by
regulator-compatible
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:51:27PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> At least, I don't think it's common to refer to nodes as phandles;
> phandles are usually the values used at "client" sites to refer to
> nodes IIUC.
Right, I always think of the phandle as being the label (which is
present at both ends of the link - the client refers to the handle the
node provdes. Though now I think about it I suppose it might be
Hungarian with the node having a handle and the client having a
phandle...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists