[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE26182.5070107@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:49:22 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system
On 06/20/2012 04:46 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> Well, it makes the kernel tell us what (amd/intel/whatever) firmware it
> wants, and requires (after patching) a simple echo 1 >foo to activate. It
> is also harmless if activated without updated firmware in place.
>
> /dev/cpu/microcode requires special software (or a dd with bs>=file size),
> since it borks if userspace breaks a microcode into two write() syscalls,
> and requires detection of the cpu vendor. Very annoying.
>
Yeah, because dd is such an exotic piece of software...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists