[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120620235503.GA31520@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:55:03 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Devendra Naga <devendra.aaru@...il.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/w1: free the w1_master at w1_free_dev and return
a correct return value
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:47:59PM +0530, Devendra Naga wrote:
> the w1_master pointer is allced at the w1_alloc_master and is not freed when called with
> w1_remove_master.
>
> when w1_alloc_dev fails the return should be -ENODEV as it does
> device_register, and that is the last case where that function
> will fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devendra Naga <devendra.aaru@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
> ---
> drivers/w1/w1_int.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1_int.c b/drivers/w1/w1_int.c
> index 6828835..a3cf27d 100644
> --- a/drivers/w1/w1_int.c
> +++ b/drivers/w1/w1_int.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static struct w1_master * w1_alloc_dev(u32 id, int slave_count, int slave_ttl,
> static void w1_free_dev(struct w1_master *dev)
> {
> device_unregister(&dev->dev);
> + kfree(dev);
No, this is wrong, the memory will be freed in w1_master_release(),
right? It is not freed here, sorry, this patch is incorrect.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists