lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340258342.4604.3983.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:59:02 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	LovelyLich <lovelylich@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How does SACK or FACK determine the time to start fast
 retransmition?

On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 22:31 +0800, LovelyLich wrote:
> HI all,
>     When tcp uses reno as its congestion control algothim, it uses
> tp->sacked_out as dup-ack. When the third dup-ack(under default
> condition) comes, tcp will initiate its fast retransmition.
>     But how about sack ?

Some tcp experts out there only catch tcp related stuff if Subject
includes TCP.

You might resend your mail on netdev (not sure lkml will really help)
with following subject :

[RFC] tcp: How does SACK or FACK determine the time to start fast
retransmission?

To get more traction.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ