[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE2C0BC.6020002@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:35:40 +0800
From: Charles Wang <muming.wq@...il.com>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
CC: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>,
'Yong Zhang' <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...hat.com>,
'Tao Ma' <tm@....ma>,
'含黛' <handai.szj@...bao.com>,
'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:12 PM, Doug Smythies wrote:
>
>>> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 08:50 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2012.06.20 02:45 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>>> My automated 63 hour test has been terminated, the code changed
>>> and the test re-started.
>
>> There's another boo-boo in there:
>
> O.K. I let the automated test finish the 3 processes stuff
> (which is 1/2 way).
> The newly compiled code is now running, but I only resumed
> the test, I did not re-start it.
>
> A comparative graph of the 1 & 2 process results is attached.
> (the previous version of this same graph was on another thread).
> Legend:
> Control: older kernel compiled with CONFIG_NO_HZ=no
> c308: Kernel with the earlier commit
> 5aaa: Basically, Kernel 3.5 RC2
> Wang: Charles Wang's first proposed solution.
> Peter35: Peter Zijlstra's current proposed solution.
>
> Summary: Extremely good.
>
Finally resolved!! ^____^
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists