linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Add one-register-per-pin type device tree based pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbi1V+Y6cMSNX_Rk_ccjk35eB6c_EJbNY620QFS8F_KRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:09:03 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Add one-register-per-pin type device tree based
 pinctrl driver

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:

> Below is the pinctrl-single patch updated with hopefully all the Stephen's
> comments addressed. The binding still needs to be looked at, see relevant
> parts of the discussion below.

I am happy with the code and the way it interacts with the pinctrl subsystem!

Now all I need to merge this is a few ACKs from select people, and
since this has a deep impact on the way device tree is used I would
*really* like for Grant or Rob to ACK it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/