[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340268104.21745.159.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:41:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com, venki@...gle.com, efault@....de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, glommer@...allels.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sched: Push put_prev_task() into
pick_next_task()
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:35 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> > +pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *p;
> > struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
> > @@ -2999,6 +3000,9 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
> > if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + if (prev)
> > + prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
> > +
> > do {
> > se = pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
> > set_next_entity(cfs_rq, se);
> > --- a/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
> > @@ -22,8 +22,12 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(stru
> > resched_task(rq->idle);
> > }
>
> Will it cause trouble when the last task on cfs_rq was dequeued before
> been putted?
>
> The cfs_rq->nr_running will be 0 and we will miss the chance to put
> prev, will we?
pick_next_task_idle() will then do the put, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists