lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMSQXEHOtgk7wRRqOdpMaTvpxFd1Cpom=BG65GheY6Z4p2Jc3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:49:13 +0200
From:	Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>
To:	Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SPI: at25: Parse dt settings

Hi,

2012/6/14 Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>:
> @@ -305,25 +305,54 @@ static ssize_t at25_mem_write(struct memory_accessor *mem, const char *buf,
> +       if (!spi->dev.platform_data) {
> +               if (np) {
> +                       u32 val;
> +
> +                       memset(&chip, 0, sizeof(chip));
> +                       strncpy(chip.name, np->name, 10);
> +
> +                       err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,byte-len", &val);
> +                       if (err) {
> +                               dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n");
> +                               goto fail;
> +                       }
> +                       chip.byte_len = val;
> +
> +                       err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,addr-mode", &val);
> +                       if (err) {
> +                               dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n");
> +                               goto fail;
> +                       }
> +                       chip.flags = (u16)val;
> +
> +                       err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,page-size", &val);
> +                       if (err) {
> +                               dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n");
> +                               goto fail;
> +                       }
> +                       chip.page_size = (u16)val;
> +               } else {
> +                       dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "no chip description\n");
> +                       err = -ENODEV;
> +                       goto fail;
> +               }
> +       } else
> +               chip = *(struct spi_eeprom *)spi->dev.platform_data;

One small remark:
In case of platform_data, the "if (!chip)" check has been removed and
is now only handled in the device tree initialization.
Maybe add this check to the platform initialization as well:

} else {
        if (!spi->dev.platform_data) {
                dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "no chip description\n");
                err = -ENODEV;
                goto fail;
        }
        chip =  *(struct spi_eeprom *)spi->dev.platform_data;
}

Furthermore looks good to me...
(Note: I am not familiar with device trees, so I cannot judge that
part of this patch)

Regards,
Ivo Sieben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ