[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANQmPXiGeUv1N7=OJ2Cm=s1X+UMExDPwAFtctCbN64yeEzkz+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:40:13 +0800
From: Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, mou Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Unzustellbar: Re: [PATCH][ANNOUNCE]RIFS-ES Scheduling V1 release.
Here is a newer benchmark around latt -c255 sleep 10 between these 3
cpu scheduler.
http://rifs-scheduler.googlecode.com/files/Result-003.PNG
RIFS-ES-Low-Spec has been posted, if you want a link please click the
follow site.(The testing data in test form and PNG statistic form)
http://code.google.com/p/rifs-scheduler/downloads/detail?name=Result-003.PNG
During the test I will move the mouse(I just move the mouse and I
don't click anything).
With BFS the mouse stalls.
With CFS or RIFS-ES-Low-Spec the mouse is very smooth.
With average latency RIFS wins, with maximum latency BFS wins.
After using it if you think it is useful please invite the others to use it.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists