[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120621104839.GE20973@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:18:39 +0930
From: Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc
related)
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:38:27PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 17:07 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > powerpc64-linux-ld: /src/next/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c:189:(.text+0x89b990):
> > > > sibling call optimization to `_restgpr0_28' does not allow automatic multiple TOCs;
> > > > recompile with -mminimal-toc or -fno-optimize-sibling-calls, or make `_restgpr0_28' extern
> > > >
Linker bug. That's not a sibling call, but a normal function return
via an out-of-line register restore function. Will fix. I'm a bit
surprised to see this with gcc-4.6 though. Or does this gcc-4.6 have
some of my recent mainline gcc patches enabling out-of-line
save/restore functions for -Os?
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists