| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1340290321.27036.166.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:52:01 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vnagarnaik@...gle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: fix uninitialized read_stamp On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 16:02 -0700, David Sharp wrote: > This fixes a scenario in which trace_pipe_raw will return events with invalid > timestamps when events are copied out one at a time (instead of swapping out > the reader page with a spare page). In this scenario, ring_buffer_read_page() > uses cpu_buffer->read_stamp to keep track of the time of the earliest event. > However, cpu_buffer->read_stamp was not always updated. The only function that > sets read_stamp to a new valid value is rb_reset_reader_page(), which is called > only by rb_get_reader_page(). rb_reset_reader_page() was not called when there > is data immediately available on the page to read (read < rb_page_size()). This > is the bug. Hi David, Thanks for the reminder, I'll be looking at it today. Do you believe that this is an urgent fix and should be marked for stable, or do you think it can wait till 3.6? If you think it should be marked for stable, then it should be pushed for 3.5. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists