linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: adjust section annotations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4FE353E0020000780008B263@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:03:28 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	<linux-cris-kernel@...s.com>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: adjust section annotations

>>> On 21.06.12 at 16:24, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 07:19 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> 
>> OK.  Ingo, do you want to take this after all?
>> 
>> If I push stuff through my PCI tree, I try really hard to make PCI
>> overall more consistent, not less consistent, so I'm not very
>> interested in taking minor improvements to just one arch.
>> 
> 
> I can take this, but the above sounds very close to a NAK to me...

If that one hunk is causing so much grief, how about I resend
the whole patch with that one change dropped?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/