[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120621104005.604fa9cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:40:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, minchan@...il.com, kosaki.motohiro@...il.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mel@....ul.ie,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 4/7] mm: make page colouring code generic
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:30:26 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 07:20 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 18:05 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >> Fix the x86-64 page colouring code to take pgoff into account.
> >
> > Shouldn't that be a separate patch?
>
> My idea was that it would be easier to review
> these two nearly identical functions together.
>
> Andrew, do you have any strong opinions?
It depends on the significance of the change. I suspect it's one of
things which speeds up many workloads by 1.5% and slows down a few
weird/important ones by 11%. Which makes it a thing to be put under
the microscope and poked at. Some people might end up reverting it,
making it tunable/configurable etc etc.
If any of that is true then yes, I guess it should be a standalone thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists